广西为您服务专业律师网_广西交通事故律师_广西婚姻律师_广西离婚律师_李坚东律师_广西房地产律师_广西婚姻继承律师_广西刑事律师_南宁交通事故律师_南宁婚姻律师_南宁离婚律师_南宁房地产律师_南宁婚姻继承律师_南宁刑事律师

名称密码验证码

设为首页

加入收藏

联系站长

最新公告：

>> 分类导航

>> 超级搜索

栏目
类别
关键词
站内搜索

>> 热点点击

克林顿绯闻案 Clinton Impeachment Trial

COMPUTER SOFTWARE LICENSING AGREEMENT

中华人民共和国工会法（修正）（附英文）

国外法律媒体网址

国际海事卫星组织（ＩＮＭＡＲＳＡＴ）特权和豁免议定书(附英文)

>> 版权及免责声明

本站资料文章其版权归作者本人所有。
如果有任何侵犯您版权的地方，请尽快与本站联系!

法律英文报道 → 法律英文报道 → 克林顿绯闻案 Clinton Impeachment Trial

查看方式：查看：[ 大字中字小字 ] [双击滚屏]

克林顿绯闻案 Clinton Impeachment Trial

发表日期： 2008/4/14 7:55:16 阅读次数： 126344 查看权限：普通信息

      law as a violation of separation of powers when it had a chance to do so
      in 1988. The Supreme Court missed a second chance to prevent impeachment
      when it failed to recognize, in Clinton v Jones, that civil suits against
      a sitting president had the serious potential to be a major distraction
      from the president's duties. Clinton should not have trusted Lewinsky to
      be discreet. Kenneth Starr should not have engaged in a sting operation
      against the President of the United States, and the Administration should
      not have engaged in an operation to trash the OIC. Finally, of course, the
      President should not have lied under oath about his relationship with
      Monica Lewinsky.
      　　Yet, the trial did happen——and what can be learned from the experience?
      Several things, it turns out.
      　　We learned that politics are very likely to determine how one views
      evidence in impeachment case——not a surprising lesson to be sure, but the
      final votes in both the House and Senate turned out to be surprisingly
      partisan. Moreover, the analysis of academics——people trained to look
      objectively at evidence——who threw themselves into the impeachment fray
      was, if anything, even more partisan than that of the politicians.
      　　We learned that the Administration's decision to go on "a war footing"
      when allegations of the President's affair with Lewinsky first surfaced
      proved costly. Relentless attacks by Clinton and his aides on the Office
      of Independent Counsel and Linda Tripp angered Republicans, polarized
      debate, and made impeachment by the House inevitable. (At the same time,
      the aggressive approach might have made acquittal in the Senate

上一页 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] 下一页

上一篇：Chinese court hears homosexual prostitution case
下一篇：没有下一条记录

【公共评论】[目前共有0条评论] [发表评论]

暂时还没有评论

第0页，共0页，共0条评论

法律图书馆	正义网	法律教育网	北大法律信息网	中国普法网	法源法律網	经济法网	法律专家论证网
法制网	诉讼法学研究院	人民法院报	中国证据法网	公法评论	中国私法网	香港律政司	中国涉外商事海事审
闫显明律师事务所	中法网	中国民商法网	中国宪政网	中国刑事法律网	中国诉讼法律网	中国法学网	中国行政诉讼网

Copyright© 2007-2009 广西为您服务专业律师网-李坚东律师 All rights reserved
工作单位:广西胜涛律师事务所
地址:广西南宁市民族大道49号民族宫B座10楼1012、1013室
电话:0771-2627883 手机: 13878185616 联系人:李坚东律师
E-mail:100868366@QQ.COM QQ：100868366，微信：WinWin668899。

委托维护：律师建站